Skip to main content

AWS Cost Optimisation

CloudFront vs. Cloudflare for Startups: An Honest Comparison

Choosing between CloudFront and Cloudflare for your startup? This detailed comparison covers pricing, performance, features, and real-world trade-offs to help you make the right decision for your needs.

Cloud Associates

Cloud Associates

You’re launching a startup. You need a CDN. You’ve narrowed it down to two options: AWS CloudFront or Cloudflare.

Every blog post and comparison chart says the same thing: “It depends on your use case.” But that’s not helpful when you’re trying to make a decision today.

This guide cuts through the marketing and gives you an honest comparison based on working with dozens of startups who’ve used both platforms. We’ll cover pricing (with real numbers), performance, ease of use, security features, and most importantly—when to choose which one.

The Quick Answer (If You’re In a Hurry)

Choose CloudFront if:

  • You’re already using AWS services (S3, EC2, Lambda, etc.)
  • You need deep AWS integration (Lambda@Edge, S3 origins, etc.)
  • You’re serving primarily to specific regions (CloudFront’s price classes help)
  • You want enterprise-grade DDoS protection (Shield Advanced)
  • You need fine-grained control over caching behaviour

Choose Cloudflare if:

  • You’re not heavily invested in AWS
  • You want simpler pricing (free tier or flat-rate plans)
  • You prioritise ease of setup (minutes vs. hours)
  • You need global performance with zero configuration
  • You want a generous free tier for early-stage projects

Now let’s dig into the details.

Pricing: The Real Costs

Pricing is where most startups start, so let’s be transparent about what you’ll actually pay.

CloudFront Pricing

CloudFront uses pay-as-you-go pricing based on:

  1. Data transfer out (varies by region)
  2. Number of requests (HTTP/HTTPS)
  3. Optional add-ons (WAF, Shield Advanced, custom SSL)

Real-world example:

  • 500K requests/month
  • 200 GB data transfer
  • Primarily North America/Europe traffic
  • Monthly cost: ~USD $25-35

At 5M requests/month:

  • 2 TB data transfer
  • Global traffic
  • Monthly cost: ~USD $180-220

Hidden costs:

  • Origin data transfer out (if using EC2/ALB): USD $0.09/GB
  • WAF: USD $5/month + USD $1/million requests
  • Invalidations: First 1,000 paths free, then USD $0.005/path
  • Real-time logs: ~USD $0.01/million log lines

Cloudflare Pricing

Cloudflare offers tiered plans:

Free Plan:

  • Unlimited bandwidth (yes, really)
  • Unlimited requests
  • Basic DDoS protection
  • Shared SSL certificate
  • Limited to 100 page rules
  • Monthly cost: USD $0

Pro Plan (USD $25/month):

  • Everything in Free
  • 20 page rules
  • Image optimisation
  • Mobile redirect
  • Polish (image compression)
  • Monthly cost: USD $25 flat

Business Plan (USD $250/month):

  • Everything in Pro
  • 50 page rules
  • Bypass Cache on Cookie
  • Advanced DDoS protection
  • Custom SSL certificate upload
  • Monthly cost: USD $250 flat

Enterprise Plan (starts at USD $6,000/month):

  • Everything in Business
  • Custom contracts and pricing
  • Direct peering with major ISPs
  • Advanced bot management
  • 24/7 enterprise support
  • Custom WAF rules
  • Monthly cost: from USD $6,000+ (custom pricing)

What this means in practice:

For a startup serving 500K-5M requests/month:

  • Cloudflare Free: USD $0 (if you can live with limitations)
  • Cloudflare Pro: USD $25/month (flat rate regardless of traffic)
  • CloudFront: USD $25-220/month (scales with traffic)

Verdict: Cloudflare wins on pricing predictability and free tier. CloudFront can be cheaper at very low volumes but gets expensive at scale.

Performance: Speed Matters

Both are fast. But “fast” means different things in different scenarios.

CloudFront Performance

What CloudFront does well:

  • Excellent for AWS-centric architectures (origin is in same region)
  • Origin Shield reduces origin load significantly
  • Lambda@Edge for dynamic content optimisation
  • Strong performance in regions you select (price classes)

Measured performance (our tests):

  • North America: ~30-50ms TTFB (cache hit)
  • Europe: ~40-60ms TTFB
  • Asia Pacific: ~50-80ms TTFB
  • Australia: ~40-70ms TTFB

Cache hit ratio: Typically 85-92% with proper configuration

Cloudflare Performance

What Cloudflare does well:

  • Consistently fast globally (280+ cities vs. CloudFront’s 450+ PoPs)
  • Aggressive default caching
  • Automatic HTTP/3 and Brotli compression
  • Argo Smart Routing for dynamic content (paid feature)

Measured performance (our tests):

  • North America: ~25-45ms TTFB (cache hit)
  • Europe: ~30-50ms TTFB
  • Asia Pacific: ~40-70ms TTFB
  • Australia: ~35-65ms TTFB

Cache hit ratio: Typically 90-95% with default settings

Important note for Australian users: If you’re on Cloudflare’s Free, Pro, or Business plans and your users are on Telstra or Optus networks, traffic may be routed via Singapore or the USA rather than directly to Australian PoPs. This is due to Cloudflare’s high costs to reach these networks. This can add 50-150ms of latency for affected users. Enterprise plans typically include direct peering with these ISPs. If your primary audience is Australian users on these networks, CloudFront may provide better performance.

Verdict: Cloudflare is slightly faster globally out-of-the-box, but CloudFront can match or exceed with proper tuning. For AWS-native stacks, CloudFront often wins due to origin proximity. For Australian startups with users on Telstra/Optus, test both platforms carefully.

Ease of Use: Setup and Management

This is where the two platforms differ significantly.

CloudFront Setup

Initial setup time: 1-3 hours for a proper production configuration

What you’ll configure:

  • Origin settings (S3 bucket, ALB, custom origin)
  • Distribution settings (SSL, HTTP versions, compression)
  • Cache behaviours (path patterns, TTLs, query strings)
  • Origin request policies
  • Cache policies
  • Security settings (OAC, HTTPS enforcement)

Ongoing management:

  • Cache invalidations (manual or via API)
  • Monitoring via CloudWatch
  • Log analysis (if enabled)
  • WAF rule management (separate service)

Developer experience:

  • Terraform/CloudFormation integration: Excellent
  • API: Comprehensive but complex
  • Console UI: Powerful but overwhelming
  • Documentation: Comprehensive but dense

Cloudflare Setup

Initial setup time: 15-30 minutes for production-ready configuration

What you’ll configure:

  • Point your nameservers to Cloudflare (if using DNS)
  • Enable “Proxy” for your domain
  • Set SSL/TLS mode
  • Configure caching rules (optional, defaults are good)

Ongoing management:

  • Purge cache (instant, easy)
  • Monitoring via Cloudflare dashboard
  • WAF rules (included, easy toggle)

Developer experience:

  • Terraform integration: Good
  • API: Clean and well-documented
  • Console UI: Intuitive and user-friendly
  • Documentation: Excellent

Verdict: Cloudflare is significantly easier to set up and manage. CloudFront requires AWS expertise and careful configuration.

Security Features

Both offer strong security, but with different approaches.

CloudFront Security

Included (free):

  • Shield Standard (DDoS protection against common attacks)
  • HTTPS/TLS 1.3 support
  • Field-level encryption
  • Geo-restriction
  • Origin Access Control (OAC) for S3

Paid add-ons:

  • AWS WAF: USD $5/month + usage (powerful, complex)
  • Shield Advanced: USD $3,000/month (enterprise DDoS protection)
  • Custom SSL certificates: Free via ACM

Security posture: Enterprise-grade if you pay for it. Shield Advanced provides cost protection and 24/7 DRT support.

Cloudflare Security

Included (even on Free plan):

  • Unmetered DDoS protection
  • Basic WAF (limited rules on Free, more on Pro/Business)
  • SSL/TLS encryption
  • Automatic HTTPS rewrites
  • Bot detection
  • Rate limiting (limited on Free)

Paid upgrades:

  • Advanced WAF rules (Pro: USD $25/month, Business: USD $250/month)
  • Advanced DDoS protection (Business plan)
  • Advanced bot management (Enterprise only)

Security posture: Excellent security-to-price ratio. Free tier includes DDoS protection that would cost thousands on CloudFront.

Verdict: Cloudflare offers more security for free. CloudFront requires paid add-ons for comparable protection, but Shield Advanced is unmatched for enterprise needs.

Integration and Ecosystem

CloudFront Integration

AWS-native advantages:

  • Seamless S3 integration (static site hosting)
  • Lambda@Edge for edge computing
  • CloudWatch metrics and alarms
  • AWS Certificate Manager (free SSL)
  • IAM for access control
  • Infrastructure-as-Code via CloudFormation/Terraform

Third-party integration:

  • Works with any origin (not just AWS)
  • Standard HTTP/HTTPS protocols
  • API-first architecture

Best for: AWS-centric architectures where CloudFront is part of a larger AWS ecosystem.

Cloudflare Integration

Cloudflare-native advantages:

  • Workers for edge computing (more flexible than Lambda@Edge)
  • Pages for static site hosting (free, fast)
  • R2 for storage (S3-compatible, cheaper egress)
  • Cloudflare Tunnels for zero-trust access
  • DNS management included
  • Email routing (free)

Third-party integration:

  • Works with any origin
  • Excellent API
  • Terraform provider
  • Integrations with Vercel, Netlify, etc.

Best for: Modern JAMstack architectures or teams not locked into AWS.

Real-World Scenarios

Scenario 1: Static Site Hosted on S3

Your setup: React SPA in S3 bucket, served globally.

CloudFront:

  • Origin: S3 bucket with OAC
  • Cost: ~$5-15/month (depends on traffic)
  • Setup complexity: Medium
  • Performance: Excellent (same-region origin)

Cloudflare:

  • Option A: Keep S3 origin, use Cloudflare as CDN
    • Cost: $0 (Free plan) + S3 costs
    • Setup: Easy (point DNS to Cloudflare)
  • Option B: Migrate to Cloudflare Pages
    • Cost: $0 (Free plan)
    • Setup: Very easy
    • Performance: Excellent

Winner: Cloudflare (lower cost, easier setup)

Scenario 2: Dynamic Application with AWS Backend

Your setup: Next.js app with API routes, backed by RDS/DynamoDB, running on ECS in Sydney.

CloudFront:

  • Origin: ALB in Sydney
  • Lambda@Edge for header manipulation
  • Origin Shield for cache efficiency
  • Cost: ~$50-150/month
  • Setup complexity: High
  • Performance: Excellent (AWS-to-AWS)

Cloudflare:

  • Origin: ALB in Sydney
  • Cloudflare Workers for dynamic routing
  • Cost: $0-25/month (Free or Pro plan) + origin costs
  • Setup complexity: Medium
  • Performance: Good (but more latency to Sydney origin)

Winner: CloudFront (better AWS integration, Origin Shield, lower origin latency)

Scenario 3: Global SaaS Application

Your setup: Multi-region app, serving customers in US, EU, APAC.

CloudFront:

  • Multiple origins (multi-region ALBs)
  • Origin Shield in each region
  • Shield Advanced for DDoS protection
  • Cost: $200-500/month (including Shield Advanced: $3,000+)
  • Setup complexity: Very high
  • Performance: Excellent with proper tuning

Cloudflare:

  • Multiple origins with Cloudflare Load Balancing
  • Argo Smart Routing for dynamic content
  • DDoS protection included
  • Cost: $250/month (Business plan) + Load Balancing costs
  • Setup complexity: Medium
  • Performance: Excellent out-of-box

Winner: Cloudflare (unless you need Shield Advanced, then CloudFront)

Migration Considerations

Moving from CloudFront to Cloudflare

Why you might migrate:

  • Lower costs at scale
  • Simpler management
  • Better free tier for side projects

Challenges:

  • DNS change required (or CNAME setup)
  • Different caching behaviours (requires testing)
  • Lambda@Edge needs to be rewritten as Cloudflare Workers
  • Losing AWS-native integrations

Downtime risk: Low (can test in parallel with DNS cutover)

Moving from Cloudflare to CloudFront

Why you might migrate:

  • Deeper AWS integration needed
  • Enterprise DDoS protection (Shield Advanced)
  • Compliance requirements (AWS-specific certifications)

Challenges:

  • More complex setup
  • Higher costs at scale
  • Need to configure caching from scratch
  • Learning curve for CloudFront configuration

Downtime risk: Low (can test in parallel)

Our Recommendation Framework

Choose CloudFront if you answer yes to 3+ of these:

  • Already using 3+ AWS services
  • Need Lambda@Edge or similar edge computing
  • Require Shield Advanced for DDoS protection
  • Have complex caching requirements
  • Team has AWS expertise
  • Need fine-grained cost allocation via AWS billing
  • Serving primarily to specific regions (price classes save money)

Choose Cloudflare if you answer yes to 3+ of these:

  • Want the simplest possible setup
  • Need predictable flat-rate pricing
  • Early-stage with low/no budget (Free tier)
  • Using modern JAMstack architecture
  • Want excellent DDoS protection without paying $3K/month
  • Team is small and wants less infrastructure management
  • Global audience with no specific region focus

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Mistake #1: Choosing based solely on price

The trap: “Cloudflare Free is $0, so it’s automatically better.”

Reality: If you’re on AWS already, CloudFront integration savings (reduced data transfer, simplified architecture) often offset the cost difference.

Mistake #2: Not considering team expertise

The trap: “CloudFront is more powerful, so it’s better for us.”

Reality: If your team doesn’t know AWS, the learning curve and misconfiguration costs can exceed any technical advantages.

Mistake #3: Ignoring origin costs

The trap: Focusing only on CDN pricing.

Reality: CloudFront can reduce origin costs significantly with Origin Shield. Cloudflare’s aggressive caching is great but doesn’t reduce origin bandwidth charges if you’re on AWS.

Mistake #4: Under-estimating setup complexity

The trap: “I’ll just spend an afternoon setting up CloudFront.”

Reality: Properly configuring CloudFront for production (caching, security, monitoring) takes time. Cloudflare can be production-ready in 30 minutes.

The Hybrid Approach

Here’s a strategy we’ve seen work well for startups:

Stage 1 (MVP): Use Cloudflare Free

  • Zero cost during validation
  • Fast setup
  • Good enough performance
  • Basic security included

Stage 2 (Growth): Evaluate based on architecture

  • If heavily AWS-native → migrate to CloudFront
  • If platform-agnostic → upgrade to Cloudflare Pro/Business
  • Decision point: ~$5K/month AWS spend

Stage 3 (Scale): Optimise for your specific needs

  • CloudFront + Shield Advanced for enterprise security
  • Cloudflare Business/Enterprise for simplicity at scale
  • Consider multi-CDN for critical applications

Conclusion

There’s no universal “better” choice. Both CloudFront and Cloudflare are excellent CDNs.

CloudFront excels when:

  • You’re deeply integrated with AWS
  • You need enterprise-grade DDoS protection
  • You have the expertise to configure it properly
  • Origin Shield and Lambda@Edge provide real value

Cloudflare excels when:

  • You want simplicity and speed of setup
  • Predictable pricing matters more than granular cost optimisation
  • You’re building on modern JAMstack platforms
  • You want great security without enterprise pricing

For most early-stage startups, we recommend starting with Cloudflare Free or Pro. It’s faster to set up, harder to misconfigure, and gives you breathing room to focus on your product.

Once you’re scaling (5M+ requests/month, $10K+ AWS spend), re-evaluate based on your architecture. If you’re AWS-native by then, CloudFront likely makes sense. If not, Cloudflare Business scales beautifully.

Need help choosing or migrating between CloudFront and Cloudflare? Our CDN/WAF Services include architecture assessment, implementation, and optimisation for both platforms. We’ll help you make the right choice for your specific needs and deliver a production-ready CDN setup in 4 weeks from $3,500.